AMD's next-gen 10-core 'Medusa Point' APU shows up on Geekbench again, with its best score yet — leaked SKU outpaces every other x86 mobile chip in the single-core test

Jul 19, 2026 - 19:07
0 0
AMD's next-gen 10-core 'Medusa Point' APU shows up on Geekbench again, with its best score yet — leaked SKU outpaces every other x86 mobile chip in the single-core test
Ryzen AI 300 (Image credit: AMD)

AMD is expected to refresh both its desktop and mobile lineups with Zen 6 next year. Ryzen AI 500 series, codenamed Medusa Point, will be the company's next-gen mobile family and we've already seen a 10-core part leak from it a couple of times. Now, that same SKU is back with another Geekbench listing, this time posting its best results that put it ahead of any mobile chip currently made by Intel or AMD (in one way).

Medusa Point 10-core SKU listed on Geekbench

(Image credit: Future)

AMD's upcoming chip ended up scoring 3,329 points in the single-core test and 16,555 points in the multi-core test. The Geekbench page once again shows the platform name as "AMD Plum-MDS1," which we've known to be associated with Medusa Point for a while now. The SKU is listed as "AMD Eng Sample 100-000001713-33_N," which is identical to how we saw in the last leak, basically confirming we're looking at the same chip.

The single-core result is almost 5% higher while the multi-core score is about 9.7% higher compared to the numbers we saw previously. In fact, the single-core result is better than any mobile part on Geekbench apart from the new Snapdragon X2 Elite lineup. Compared to desktop equivalents, it's very close to the 9900X and the 9800X3D — two absolute desktop powerhouses carrying 12 cores and 8 cores, respectively.

Swipe to scroll horizontally

SKU

Config

Single-Core Score

Difference

Qualcomm X2 Elite X2E-90-100

Mobile, 18C

3,573

100%

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

Desktop, 12C

3,333

93%

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

Desktop, 8C

3,333

93%

AMD Ryzen 9 565?

Mobile, 10C

3,329

93%

AMD Ryzen 5 9600X

Desktop, 6C

3,318

93%

Intel Core i9-14900KS

Desktop, 24C

3,226

90%

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Desktop, 24C

3,195

89%

AMD Ryzen 9 565? (Previous)

Mobile, 10C

3,174

89%

The multi-core score puts this 10-core SKU right alongside the Ryzen AI Max+ 390, which is just a tier below the top-end AI Max+ 395 from Strix Halo. Since this is a 10-core part, we can infer it's the Ryzen AI 9 565 because the Ryzen AI 9 365 (from Strix Point) and Ryzen AI 9 465 (from Gorgon Point) share the same configs. The Ryzen AI 9 365 has an average score of 12,410, so Medusa Point's offering is 33% faster in this regard.

Swipe to scroll horizontally

SKU

Config

Multi-Core Score

Difference

Qualcomm X2 Elite X2E-90-100

Mobile, 18C

18,026

78%

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Desktop, 16C

22,169

96%

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

Desktop, 12C

19,696

86%

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

Desktop, 8C

18,317

80%

AMD Ryzen 9 565?

Mobile, 10C

16,555

72%

AMD Ryzen 5 9600X

Desktop, 6C

14,742

64%

Intel Core i9-14900KS

Desktop, 24C

23,008

100%

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Desktop, 24C

22,472

98%

AMD Ryzen 9 565? (Previous)

Mobile, 10C

15,092

66%

The Geekbench listing also reports the correct clock speeds this time — 2.0 GHz is still lasted as the base frequency, but the boost frequency is marked at 5.37 GHz, which makes a lot more sense. Moreover, the listing shows 10MB of L2 cache and 32MB of L3 cache while the Ryzen AI 9 465 had a combined cache tally of 34MB.

Overall, this benchmark is an incredibly promising showing for Medusa Point. The Red Team's next-gen mobile lineup seems to benefit heavily from an architectural jump thanks to the Zen 6 silicon. Keep in mind that this is the company's mainstream mobile offering that's supposed to compete with Intel's Panther Lake, while Nova Lake mobile and AMD's own Gator Range (Ryzen 10000) will serve only as high-end CPUs.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.

What's Your Reaction?

Like Like 0
Dislike Dislike 0
Love Love 0
Funny Funny 0
Wow Wow 0
Sad Sad 0
Angry Angry 0

Comments (0)

User