Commvault says it's time to rethink resiliency as AI crooks leave victims in a 'dark, dead' state
security
Those backup plans need backup testing
AI-enabled cybercriminals have better tools and are inflicting more pain on their victims, wiping out virtual machines and hypervisors and leaving infrastructure in a "dark, dead" state after an attack, said Commvault Chief Technology Officer Brian Brockway.
"The majority of cyber cases that we've seen in the customer base have moved well beyond the breaking inside, and encrypting and corrupting some of your key files and folders, to taking over control of your entire VM environment, wiping out all VMs, destroying all hypervisors, blowing up the center and leaving you in basically a dark, dead state," Brockway told The Register.
Frontier AI is reshaping the threat landscape in two ways, he explained: advanced models are uncovering a deluge of software vulnerabilities, and attackers are exploiting disclosed flaws within minutes rather than weeks.
“The more unplanned work that has to be done to react to this, that's always going to challenge priorities,” Brockway said. “We had the plan in place, we had sprints already dedicated to kind of get out to the next launch, and we have to come back over and reinvest more engineering time to corrective actions versus the next new get ahead feature.”
Commvault cited Palo Alto Networks research showing that frontier AI models such as Mythos and GPT-5.5-Cyber identified more than seven times the typical number of software vulnerabilities found within a single month during testing.
To prepare for this, Commvault recommends that IT and security teams look beyond backups and ask whether they can restore critical systems cleanly, whether recovery environments are isolated from compromised production systems, and whether recovery plans include the most important applications and dependencies.
Brockway said air-gapping is the starting point. He said organizations should keep immutable and isolated copies of critical data separated from production identity, network, and management planes, and pressure-test recovery time and recovery point objectives against realistic attack scenarios, a hard lesson learned from witnessing victims recover from recent attacks.
“One team is just trying to even clear the smoke to figure out what happened, then you have to come back over, strip it all down to bare metal, and basically redeploy the data center all over again,” he said. “While that's ongoing – and that's not a couple hour process by any means, that could take you, even in a well-exercised environment, it could be a couple of days or longer to get it back into a stable, usable state – what are our sanitized versions that we're going to come back over to (in order to) rebuild or restart the business again?”
Businesses should prioritize the systems they cannot operate without — identity platforms, billing systems, operational databases, and cloud services — and define the order in which they will be restored, he said. As AI moves into core operations, teams should also account for newer dependencies such as data pipelines, model repositories, vector databases, and agentic workflows.
In its recommendations, Commvault said it is also critical that organizations continuously test recovery. Brockway recommends rehearsing those plans in isolated cleanroom environments before the worst happens.
“I need a testing environment that's got the same makeup, the same builds, which we're using, maybe not on full production resources, but I need to be able to say, ‘How do I put that application stack into a live environment, so we can come back over and test?’ “ he said. “That's what we're saying about things like this clean room concept of not just being a reaction to an incident, but it is also a quick environment for you to come back over and clone.”
Brockway said this new normal in the AI era is straining the engineers who build and maintain enterprise software. He said while the first wave of AI scanning tools flooded teams with potential vulnerabilities, newer models go further, entering controlled environments and attempting the exploits themselves — a capability that mirrors what attackers do.
"When you let them in, you have to do it under an extremely tight security control, because you're effectively almost automating the same thing that bad guys can do on the outside too," Brockway said.
The output can swamp downstream teams. Brockway said one frontier model flagged roughly 10,000 critical vulnerabilities across operating systems, browsers, and other infrastructure.
"That's 10,000 patches that have to come out of the system," he said.
That volume forces hard choices about engineering priorities. Brockway said unplanned remediation work pulls staff off planned releases. To absorb the load at Commvault, Brockway runs a standing group dedicated to just those items.
"They're the fast action team to analyze, make a quick assessment," he said.
Brockway said the signal volume emerging from AI bug finders ultimately calls for more automation and AI to filter noise, assist with patching, and support deployment.
"The amount of information and signals that are coming in are way overwhelming. People just get desensitized, and that's when bad things really start to occur," he said.®
What's Your Reaction?
Like
0
Dislike
0
Love
0
Funny
0
Wow
0
Sad
0
Angry
0
Comments (0)