Taylor Sheridan's Hit 3-Part Spy Thriller Quietly Predicted One of Today's Biggest Headlines

Jul 01, 2026 - 10:08
0 2
Taylor Sheridan's Hit 3-Part Spy Thriller Quietly Predicted One of Today's Biggest Headlines
Bruce McGill in Lioness Image via Paramount+

Published Jul 1, 2026, 12:45 AM EDT

Thomas Butt is a senior writer. An avid film connoisseur, Thomas actively logs his film consumption on Letterboxd and vows to connect with many more cinephiles through the platform. He is immensely passionate about the work of Martin Scorsese, John Ford, and Albert Brooks. His work can be read on Collider and Taste of Cinema. He also writes for his own blog, The Empty Theater, on Substack. He is also a big fan of courtroom dramas and DVD commentary tracks. For Thomas, movie theaters are a second home. A native of Wakefield, MA, he is often found scrolling through the scheduled programming on Turner Classic Movies and making more room for his physical media collection. Thomas habitually increases his watchlist and jumps down a YouTube rabbit hole of archived interviews with directors and actors. He is inspired to write about film to uphold the medium's artistic value and to express his undying love for the art form. Thomas looks to cinema as an outlet to better understand the world, human emotions, and himself.

There's a reason why Taylor Sheridan's television empire has become so expansive. The tentacles of Sheridan's artistic vision, notably the various spin-offs of his crown jewel, Yellowstone, have ostensibly become the backbone of Paramount's entire streaming library. Regardless of his political beliefs, Sheridan has tapped into the American Midwest in a way that is often ignored by prestige TV. One of his most recent triumphs on the small screen, Lioness, sees Sheridan tackling a familiar sentiment in American media throughout the century: the war on terror. Initially positioned as a new take on government intervention in the Middle East, Lioness, starring Zoe Saldaña as the leader of a CIA program to thwart terrorist plots, focused on the drug cartel and its intersection with government affairs overseas. Without trying to predict the future, Sheridan's writing has eerily mirrored real-life headlines involving U.S. action against the drug trade.

'Lioness' Season 2 Inadvertently Predicted Real-Life Political Events

Season 1 of Lioness follows Joe McNamara (Saldaña) as she leads a covert CIA unit comprised of women to thwart terrorist groups in the Middle East — a familiar concept, given the typical Sheridan touch, that makes it feel fresh and revelatory about top-secret military operations. Now heading into its third season, premiering on August 2, Lioness has unexpectedly embraced a new kind of drama thanks to its timeliness. Centered around the international drug trade, Season 2 features the Lioness squad embarking on an extraction of a kidnapped high-ranking government official and infiltrating cartels to serve the interests of political forces domestically. The squad's target is Alvaro Carrillo (Marcus DeAnda), who becomes the focal point of the government's various espionage tactics and their broader attempt to control economic interests internationally.

Joe McNamara (Zoe Saldaña) covered in blood after a transport goes wrong in 'Lioness' Season 2. Related

Season 2 debuted on October 27, 2024, over a year before the United States launched a military strike in Venezuela and apprehended President Nicolás Maduro on charges of drug trafficking, a striking turn of events that has been one of the many political disputes dividing the nation. For those catching up with Lioness before its Season 3 premiere, Season 2 appears to be a dramatic reinterpretation of events ripped from the headlines, but Sheridan actually beat the political cycle to the punch.

Taylor Sheridan Taps Into the Heart of the Contemporary U.S. Military in 'Lioness'

As a guest on The Joe Rogan Experience, Sheridan discussed his writing process for Season 2. However, he denied any attempt to predict the future and said the decision to center the season around such eerily timely matters was purely coincidental. If anything, his scripts were merely an educated guess about the current state of political affairs overseas. Despite his prominence in television as a voice for middle America, particularly audiences in red states, Sheridan has vowed that he approaches his work without a political agenda, with Lioness meant to be a literal dissection of the relationship between intelligence agencies and the military.

There's been plenty of discussion surrounding Sheridan's alleged political beliefs and how they are reflected in his Westerns, crime and war thrillers, and dramas about oil tycoons. Regardless of where he stands or whether he sympathizes with his characters, there's no doubt Sheridan resonates with the mainstream public, and his wealth of new shows on Paramount speaks to the demand for more of his stories. Although it has been proven to predict real news stories, Lioness is rooted in an understanding of modern U.S. history and the nation's dealings overseas, as the series echoes 2000s-era media coverage of the Iraq War and the murky divide between patriotic vengeance and the protection of the oil trade.

Whatever your preconceived notions of Sheridan's work, both seasons of Lioness end not with a sense of rah-rah jingoism, but instead with a sobering indictment of the American military-industrial complex. In Season 1, our idyllic heroes realize they're only fighting over oil, and in Season 2, the grueling labor and hardships to overthrow the cartel are futile, as someone else on the ladder will take over Carrillo's throne. Conservative or not, Sheridan has tapped into the cynicism of the American spirit in 2026.

What's Your Reaction?

Like Like 0
Dislike Dislike 0
Love Love 0
Funny Funny 0
Wow Wow 0
Sad Sad 0
Angry Angry 0

Comments (0)

User